Skip to main content
UrbanVakeel
Live wire
The HinduSupreme Court refuses to intervene in Delhi HC decision on CPV tenders in four Indian missionsBrutCan Sonam Wangchuk Be Force-Fed? What Indian Law Actually SaysNews On AIRWhite House confirms temporary 10 per cent tariff for India after US Supreme Court rulingwww.iconnectblog.comThe Supreme Court of India and Invisibilization of Judicial CorruptionThe India ForumWhat the SIR Case says about the Supreme CourtBloomberg.comIndia Court Ruling Extends Visa Uncertainty for TravelersBar and BenchOverrule launches Agentic Operating System for Supreme Court LawyersVerdictumForeign Counsel Cannot Examine Or Cross Examine Witnesses In India Before Court Commissioner: Kerala High ...India LegalSupreme Court upholds quashing of CPV outsourcing tenders at four Indian missionsFairPlanetIndia's Cockroach Revolution: How a Supreme Court Insult Sparked a Youth-Led Political MovementMediaNamaSupreme Court lawyers’ body opposes mandatory AI disclosure in draft AI regulationsThe Indian ExpressKarnataka State Law University ordered to provide transgender quota for LLBETV BharatBill To Hike Number Of SC Judges To Be Introduced In Lok Sabha TodayVajiram & RaviRight to Protest in India, Article 19, Permission, RestrictionsThe New Indian ExpressSC stays HC order permitting Devangana Kalita to inspect unrelied-upon documents in Delhi riots case

Business Law

Cheque Bounce Under Section 138: A Complete Guide

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act criminalises cheque dishonour for insufficient funds. The procedure is technical and the timeline is unforgiving.


By Editorial Desk1 min read
Bounced cheque and bank slip
Bounced cheque and bank slip

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are technically criminal, but they function more like a debt-recovery mechanism. The Act builds in multiple notice and timeline requirements; missing any of them is fatal.

The mandatory timeline

  1. Cheque presented within validity (3 months from date of cheque)

  2. Cheque returned dishonoured by the bank

  3. Demand notice sent within 30 days of receiving the dishonour memo

  4. Drawer has 15 days to pay after notice

  5. Complaint must be filed within 30 days of expiry of the 15-day window

Essential elements

  • The cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt

  • The cheque was presented within validity

  • The cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds or arrangement

  • Demand notice was served properly

  • The drawer failed to pay within 15 days

Common defences

The accused often raises that the cheque was given as security, that there was no consideration, or that the cheque was issued under coercion. Recent Supreme Court decisions have clarified the presumption under Section 139 — the cheque is presumed to be for a legally enforceable debt unless the accused proves otherwise.

The 30-day window for sending the demand notice is the most commonly missed deadline. Once missed, the cause of action under Section 138 is permanently lost.

The Brief · the newsletter

Short legal explainers in your inbox.

Continue reading