Skip to main content
UrbanVakeel
Live wire
Supreme Court ObserverSC quashes Jantar Mantar protest FIRs across India, permits fresh FIR against 2873ReutersIndia's Supreme Court dismisses market regulator's case against NSE in unfair access caseLawBeat“Doesn’t Conduce To Certainty”: Justice RF Nariman Flags Uncertainty In Arbitration LawSCC OnlineGoverning AI Hallucinations: Evaluating the Supreme Court’s Zero-Tolerance RuleNews On AIRWhite House confirms temporary 10 per cent tariff for India after US Supreme Court rulingMoneycontrol.comWhy this Constitutional route to becoming a Supreme Court judge has never been usedtimesofindia.indiatimes.comTelangana high court battles 2.2 lakh pending cases amid judge shortfallLive LawForeign Medical Degrees Must Be Authenticated For Candidates To Appear In FMGE: Delhi High Courtindianexpress.comNo ‘joint parenting’ concept in India: Bombay High Court sets aside 50:50 custody orderMLexIndia's top court scraps $45m customs penalty over AI-hallucinated casesBBCOdisha: Why Dara Singh, murderer of Christian missionary Graham Staines and his sons, may walk free in IndiaHindustan TimesExplained: The unused constitutional clause on Supreme Court appointments | Hindustan TimesThe New Indian Express'Beyond Jurisdiction': Chhattisgarh HC raps State Women Commission, sets aside orders halting GAIL projectFrontline MagazineIndia’s ERP Test and the Unequal Burden on MinoritiesSCC OnlineJustice R.F. Nariman calls for greater certainty and accuracy in India's arbitration regime at GHAC Arbitration Week 2026

Business Law

Cheque Bounce Under Section 138: A Complete Guide

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act criminalises cheque dishonour for insufficient funds. The procedure is technical and the timeline is unforgiving.


By Editorial Desk1 min read
Bounced cheque and bank slip
Bounced cheque and bank slip

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are technically criminal, but they function more like a debt-recovery mechanism. The Act builds in multiple notice and timeline requirements; missing any of them is fatal.

The mandatory timeline

  1. Cheque presented within validity (3 months from date of cheque)

  2. Cheque returned dishonoured by the bank

  3. Demand notice sent within 30 days of receiving the dishonour memo

  4. Drawer has 15 days to pay after notice

  5. Complaint must be filed within 30 days of expiry of the 15-day window

Essential elements

  • The cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt

  • The cheque was presented within validity

  • The cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds or arrangement

  • Demand notice was served properly

  • The drawer failed to pay within 15 days

Common defences

The accused often raises that the cheque was given as security, that there was no consideration, or that the cheque was issued under coercion. Recent Supreme Court decisions have clarified the presumption under Section 139 — the cheque is presumed to be for a legally enforceable debt unless the accused proves otherwise.

The 30-day window for sending the demand notice is the most commonly missed deadline. Once missed, the cause of action under Section 138 is permanently lost.

The Brief · the newsletter

Short legal explainers in your inbox.

Continue reading