Skip to main content
UrbanVakeel
Live wire
www.iconnectblog.comWhen Apex Courts Disown Their Watchdogs: India, Judicial Accountability, and the Proprietary TurnSCC OnlinePresident Appoints Four Chief Justices and One Senior Advocate to Supreme Court, Taking Working Strength Closer to New Sanctioned Strength of 38Bar and BenchJudicial recognition of ‘transnational issue estoppel’ in India: Fortifying finality in International Commercial ArbitrationIndian Television Dot ComBroadcasters to take Ad-Cap battle to Supreme Court soon after HC blowDT Next5 things to know about newly appointed Supreme Court judge Venkita MohanaLawBeatSupreme Court Weekly Round Up [May 25- May 31, 2026]WIONMeet the lawyer who skipped High Court bench and went straight to India’s Supreme CourtStoryboard18TV broadcasters weigh Supreme Court appeal against ad-cap verdictANI NewsSupreme Court gets five new judges, strength increases to 37The Indian ExpressRemoving ‘Thali’ (mangalsutra), false allegations amount to ‘mental cruelty’: Court ends 49-year-old marriageMid-dayThe Judicial Catalyst: How Supreme Court Jurisprudence is Driving the Rise of Indian Commercial Arbitrationnktv.inChief Justice of India administers oath to five new Supreme Court judgesThePrintSubscriberWrites: Euthanasia for Dogs: The Supreme Court’s stance on public safety and animal welfare in IndiaThe New Indian ExpressSupreme Court strength increases to 37 as five new judges sworn inHealth Policy WatchMore Girls Will Finish School if India’s Supreme Court Ruling on Menstrual Health is Implemented

Business Law

Cheque Bounce Under Section 138: A Complete Guide

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act criminalises cheque dishonour for insufficient funds. The procedure is technical and the timeline is unforgiving.


By Editorial Desk1 min read
Bounced cheque and bank slip
Bounced cheque and bank slip

Cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are technically criminal, but they function more like a debt-recovery mechanism. The Act builds in multiple notice and timeline requirements; missing any of them is fatal.

The mandatory timeline

  1. Cheque presented within validity (3 months from date of cheque)

  2. Cheque returned dishonoured by the bank

  3. Demand notice sent within 30 days of receiving the dishonour memo

  4. Drawer has 15 days to pay after notice

  5. Complaint must be filed within 30 days of expiry of the 15-day window

Essential elements

  • The cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt

  • The cheque was presented within validity

  • The cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds or arrangement

  • Demand notice was served properly

  • The drawer failed to pay within 15 days

Common defences

The accused often raises that the cheque was given as security, that there was no consideration, or that the cheque was issued under coercion. Recent Supreme Court decisions have clarified the presumption under Section 139 — the cheque is presumed to be for a legally enforceable debt unless the accused proves otherwise.

The 30-day window for sending the demand notice is the most commonly missed deadline. Once missed, the cause of action under Section 138 is permanently lost.

The Brief · the newsletter

Short legal explainers in your inbox.

Continue reading