Skip to main content
UrbanVakeel
Live wire
Frontline MagazineJustice Sharma Recusal Row and India’s Judicial Ethicsreuters.comIndia's top court rebukes government over timeline for food warning labelsSouth China Morning Post‘Law enforcement failure’: India’s top court urges accountability over rapesLive LawShould Indian Courts Include 'Honourable Acquittal' In Right To Be Forgotten?scconline.comBombay HC extends SAP India's arbitral tribunal mandate by one year | SCC TimesLawBeatISKCON Temple Battle: Supreme Court Urged To List Review Plea in 25-Year Bengaluru–Mumbai FeudDW.comIndia: LPU suspends classes after unrest over alleged rapeThe New Indian ExpressSC Collegium recommends elevation of three HC chief justices for appointment as apex court judgesBar and BenchElection Commission row: Plea in Supreme Court alleges unilateral decision-making by CEC Gyanesh KumarThe Indian ExpressDecide Trinamool symbol dispute in 4 months: Supreme Court tells Election Commission of IndiaIndia LegalSupreme Court dismisses PIL seeking probe into alleged offshore fund routing, Adani transactionsIndia TodaySupreme Court asks Centre to consider parental consent for minors on social mediaMoneycontrol.comEY moves Supreme Court over tax on employees sent from overseas offices to IndiaLive LawMake Rules To Regulate Children's Social Media Usage : Supreme Court Tells CentreThe Indian ExpressEx-judge Abhay Oka: Can’t compare Election Commission and Collegium appointments

Family Law

Allahabad HC: Hindu Marriage Cannot Be Dissolved by Unilateral Declaration on Stamp Paper, Upholds Wife's Maintenance

A Single Judge Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi was hearing a criminal revision filed by a husband challenging a family court order directing him to pay ₹2,200 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 CrPC


By Editorial Desk1 min read
photo-1593115057322-e94b77572f20
photo-1593115057322-e94b77572f20

The Allahabad High Court has held that a marriage between two Hindus can be dissolved only through the modes recognised under the Hindu Marriage Act, and not by a unilateral declaration executed on a stamp paper.

A Single Judge Bench of Justice Subhash Vidyarthi was hearing a criminal revision filed by a husband challenging a family court order directing him to pay ₹2,200 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 CrPC. The husband contended that the parties had divorced by mutual consent as per local custom fourteen years before the maintenance application, and produced an alleged divorce agreement drawn up unilaterally by the wife on a ₹10 stamp paper, attested by witnesses.

Rejecting this, the Court held that the marriage "was not dissolved in accordance with law" and that the wife remained legally wedded to the husband. It further observed that the husband's subsequent marriage to another woman, with whom he had three children, while his first marriage subsisted, gave the wife "reasonable cause" to live separately.

On the fourteen-year delay in seeking maintenance, the Court noted that Section 125 CrPC prescribes no limitation period, and that the wife's pursuit of the claim had been disrupted by personal tragedy following her brother's death.

The revision was accordingly dismissed and the family court's maintenance order upheld.

Case: Vinod Kumar @ Sant Ram v. Smt. Shiv Rani

The Brief · the newsletter

Short legal explainers in your inbox.

Continue reading